Today we were invited by management to a reunion "extraordinary" at 2 pm in the meeting room of the "project."
At the meeting, the Direction has communicated the result of "certification" prior to the audit that EHS had been two technicians from abroad.
With a profusion of photographs have detected a large number of non-conformities and that has given rise to the head of EHS in Europe (De Haan) has sent an email to the editor which insists on placing security above other concepts and, in some way, questioned the direction of the company (middle well) are committed to it.
As his assailant, the director wanted, in a sense, our partnership ("to you more if you make me") to instruct staff in this regard.
They insisted that this situation is given by the successive processes that the plant has experienced in recent times: the downsizing, the "need" to save cash on concepts such as security, the number of complaints and claims neglected by the company, the lack of seriousness that they put the demands of the / as workers, etc.
Although we understand that Atout / workers have continued to meet with security as well is reflected in the report itself certifiers, in which there is no aspect of "reproach" to the template. ESK
believe that the issue of security is very important that we faced from the collaboration, without this trade dispute. But this is not at odds with to be honest with the "other" side and do not ask for cooperation when the shoe pinches us and let us stick and whack when, as a demonstration of command and control, we do not like what we see or we have to put a medal to someone.
Greetings.
0 comments:
Post a Comment