Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
How Can Women Be Skinny With Boobs
THIS CHRISTMAS GIFTS IN YOUR DELARIS. Notice
Click on image to view the full catalog. 
Click on image to view the full catalog. 
Friday, November 13, 2009
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Christmas Present For Stroke Patients
MUNICIPAL GROUP OF LEFT XUNIDA LAVIANA CITY COUNCIL, UNDER THE RULES OF ORGANISATION, FUNCTION AND STATUS OF LOCAL
to the plenary of the City Council has the following
MOTION
Llaviana city council, as is well known by all political groups represented in the full of it, faces serious difficult economic situation much maintenance of all existing facilities and services. One of the main economic problems we face is an enormous energy expenditure by the council. Today there are innovative technologies that can deal with the reduction of economic costs related to energy saving. One of them is to install solar panels in our municipal buildings. The other by the new lighting systems, known as the LED's that experience significant energy savings compared to traditional lighting already be installed in the new works as the avenue.
The installation of solar thermal is a good method of saving. Using solar, gas or electricity bill could drop by 50% and 80% annually. The installation of solar thermal panels typically amortized over a period of 6 to 8 years, depending on the traditional energy to replace, taking into account that the lifetime of the system should exceed 20 years, you can get 60% of free hot water for 12 years at least, for example. In addition, plates can be installed in public buildings for sale of energy. The sale of it is economically beneficial because the selling price three times the purchase.
Regarding LEDs could be achieved by reducing consumption and increasing efficiency by 80%. It lasts up to 100,000 hours, its effectiveness is also evident for climate change. Do not emit heat or UV or infrared light are nice and very powerful for the consumer are miserable. They are ultimately the lighting model of the future become present.
From the municipal group of IU wish that both models of energy saving, pointers are used in our municipality. We hope to put our town in a situation unbeatable in the fight against climate change. Aspire to make our municipality in respect of northern Spain. But also we must keep in mind that with the implementation of this measure we are going to reduce one of the biggest expenses of the annual budget, up from 400000 in more than 80%, freeing up a significant amount of credit that may contribute to improving services for all citizens of our council.
Therefore, it is submitted for consideration of full approval of the following agreement:
1) That in the next economic plans to reserve items to install: solar panels for both consumption and sale as the LED's.
2) That in each and every one of the new works that are undertaken within the council related to illumination and the inclusion of the new system.
In Laviana to October 20, 2009
FDO. JOSE DIAZ GONZALEZ
Municipal Group Spokesman Left Xunida
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Hook Pc To Pioneer Receiver
MUNICIPAL GROUP OF LEFT XUNIDA LAVIANA CITY COUNCIL, UNDER THE RULES OF ORGANISATION, FUNCTION AND STATUS OF LOCAL
this before the full City Council presented the following MOTION
In recent months we have witnessed in our country the collapse of the capitalist system and the end of a speculative growth model that takes the victim to countless workers in this country. The crisis seems to have no end, and is not taking appropriate measures so that it can be reversed by replacing the speculative growth, through a change of model, growth that can generate real wealth and, more importantly, create jobs and prosperity for all our citizens. Since our formation we are convinced that the involvement of municipalities is fundamental in the construction of a new model is more, we ensure that if municipalities are not involved in the search for an alternative model of welfare and jobs for their citizens will be impossible to establish a firm foundation to end the crisis.
To all this we must add the aggravation of our town situated in one of the most depressed regions of Asturias, which means that, for lack of opportunities, many young people are forced to migration Forced to their value is recognized beyond our borders. Denied recognition in his homeland are sure it will be given elsewhere, as the generations have a more prepared than ever known in our region.
The lack of those brains that could search for new initiatives that would lead to our town to leave their particular causes crisis, moreover, that the opportunities for workers in general are also scarce. For all
described since Llaviana UI, just as we made it clear at the beginning of the preamble, we absolutely must put the council to work with the intention of intervening in the economy seeking local solutions to generate new jobs and entrepreneurial activities within our council. Therefore I propose the following package of economic measures to be submitted for consideration of full approval:
1 º created an annual scholarship for young students amounting to 6000 Euros and to seek, through the development of a study new economic opportunities within our Council and leveraging our resources. It would be only one scholarship per year and to decide it would be asked the help of a group of academics, from a multidisciplinary point of view, constitute the jury has to decide which project should be scholarship.
2 º That following the results of that study was launched, in collaboration with the INEM and Valnalón, a series of courses, as necessary, to enable training professionals who may be involved in the development of initiatives directed the study.
3 º Launching the known as microcredit, small grants for the municipality to allow for operating the entrepreneurial activities related to these initiatives. Micro credit for such a call would open the year in which new entrepreneurs can gain a total aid of around 3000 euros, with a total fund for such grants would amount EUR 12000. Composition would require a new jury to determine the feasibility, the possibility of employment generation, etc., of each initiative to the granting of microcredit.
In Laviana to September 9, 2009
FDO. JOSE DIAZ GONZALEZ
Municipal Group Spokesman Left
Xunida this before the full City Council presented the following MOTION
In recent months we have witnessed in our country the collapse of the capitalist system and the end of a speculative growth model that takes the victim to countless workers in this country. The crisis seems to have no end, and is not taking appropriate measures so that it can be reversed by replacing the speculative growth, through a change of model, growth that can generate real wealth and, more importantly, create jobs and prosperity for all our citizens. Since our formation we are convinced that the involvement of municipalities is fundamental in the construction of a new model is more, we ensure that if municipalities are not involved in the search for an alternative model of welfare and jobs for their citizens will be impossible to establish a firm foundation to end the crisis.
To all this we must add the aggravation of our town situated in one of the most depressed regions of Asturias, which means that, for lack of opportunities, many young people are forced to migration Forced to their value is recognized beyond our borders. Denied recognition in his homeland are sure it will be given elsewhere, as the generations have a more prepared than ever known in our region.
The lack of those brains that could search for new initiatives that would lead to our town to leave their particular causes crisis, moreover, that the opportunities for workers in general are also scarce. For all
described since Llaviana UI, just as we made it clear at the beginning of the preamble, we absolutely must put the council to work with the intention of intervening in the economy seeking local solutions to generate new jobs and entrepreneurial activities within our council. Therefore I propose the following package of economic measures to be submitted for consideration of full approval:
1 º created an annual scholarship for young students amounting to 6000 Euros and to seek, through the development of a study new economic opportunities within our Council and leveraging our resources. It would be only one scholarship per year and to decide it would be asked the help of a group of academics, from a multidisciplinary point of view, constitute the jury has to decide which project should be scholarship.
2 º That following the results of that study was launched, in collaboration with the INEM and Valnalón, a series of courses, as necessary, to enable training professionals who may be involved in the development of initiatives directed the study.
3 º Launching the known as microcredit, small grants for the municipality to allow for operating the entrepreneurial activities related to these initiatives. Micro credit for such a call would open the year in which new entrepreneurs can gain a total aid of around 3000 euros, with a total fund for such grants would amount EUR 12000. Composition would require a new jury to determine the feasibility, the possibility of employment generation, etc., of each initiative to the granting of microcredit.
In Laviana to September 9, 2009
FDO. JOSE DIAZ GONZALEZ
Municipal Group Spokesman Left
Siren Red Crepe Myrtal
Under the slogan "More than 20 good reasons to support the Left, from left Xunida of Llaviana, launch a campaign which has a deadline the next municipal elections and that will correspond to more than 20 motions involving the main themes of the council.
The campaign will begin today be officially presented tomorrow, at which time we will introduce the first of those over 20 reasons for supporting the left that will aim to boost our council in the economic as well as employment generation.
With this campaign, from IU Llaviana, we intend to demonstrate that our training, compared with paralysis of other training by the economic situation, if you have answers and proposals to our council emerge stronger out of the doldrums in which we and our youth have opportunities for research, training and work (in short opportunities) within our council.
Within the same will also be addressed many issues affecting our council and related to different aspects of municipal management are also useful to better the lives of their citizens (environment, culture, tourism, transport, sport ...).
Thursday, June 25, 2009
1985 Matchbox Battery Operated
The right to full employment and the nullity of the dismissal purpose of "renting of the goal." By Alexander A. Segura.
It glaring, as shown, that the species are expressed diametrically opposed views on human rights involved in the issue at the appropriate call "What if we rented the goal?".
At least it has become clear, opposition for lack of recognition of the axiological primacy of social rights over individual or collective and symbolic reference Protectoria character of labor law, principles, both reached by the discursive assumptions rehearse in our early work.
Nevertheless, other issues need more emphasis.
arbitrary or unfair dismissal is a wrongful act.
This assertion coined by JUSTO LOPEZ classic seems to be sufficient reason for the lawyer committed to the international law of human rights to defend abdicate moral wrongfulness and build a further arguments with this harmful substance. We said at work, and it has not been contradicted, that if the consortium decides to fire a person to rent housing viola dos derechos fundamentales de esa persona, ya que lo deja “sin trabajo y sin vivienda”.
Despedir no está permitido como lo supone el saber vulgar. La cláusula constitucional de “protección contra el despido arbitrario” pena con una ilicitud tarifada rescindir sin invocar causa o hacerlo sin demostrar justa causa. El acto ilícito sería válido, según la mayoría de la doctrina laboralista, salvo que, como bien lo señala el Dr. Resqui Pizarro podría nulificarse:
…si se viera originado en la intención de dejar libre la habitación destinada a vivienda del trabajador para ser luego de modificado su destino primitivo conforme el RCA puesta en rental to others, it was considered discriminatory and unlawful action by the employer-consortium, which would alter the public order established in the system.
In any case, the "ultimate cause" of the act of firing would also be illegal, not only constitute a discriminatory act (which has other nullification device), but for violating labor law and order, as we have seen, defines the fate of the housing can not be altered to the detriment of any worker providing services in buildings that actually or potentially consortium. dismissal if I rent a property protected by the labor law, the cause of the act illegal. The working device that validates the dismissal may be circumvented petitioning the invalidity of the act antecedent.
Therefore, the so-called "property rights" on the home goal is "limited" by a rule of law and order and if the same joint holder of that (the consortium) intends to exercise it in violation of a rule of public policy, incur an abuse of the law (art. 1071, VCCI.), to the extent that the act which manifests such action is illegal and null Surrogate (art. 18, C. cit.), in addition to denature the legally protected by the system establish the institution in question. Nothing
tiene que ver con esta cuestión el desalojo de un trabajador despedido.
La mención de una serie de fallos de la C. Nac. Trab. que se ha formulado intenta poner énfasis en un argumento inocuo. El trabajador despedido debe desocupar la vivienda y si no lo hace, el consorcio está en todo su derecho de desalojarlo e, incluso, querellarlo por usurpación sin que el obrero pueda invocar un infundado “derecho de retención”.
El derecho del consorcio a peticionar el desalojo de la portería no transforma ipso iure a el bien en cuestión en un espacio común cuyo destino pueda alterarse alegremente en trasgresión al orden público laboral. La confusión entre la naturaleza jurídica pay housing provision, obviously linked to an employment contract in force, not stirred "the legal fate of public policy" that haunts the home goal, he regains his fitness as such to be occupied by another worker building real or potential and become another accessory of another contract.
Full employment.
is a human right justiciable. Resta remind the Lords Commissioners of the Horizontal Property Law that art. 6 of the ICESCR states:
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right to work, which includes the right of everyone to have the opportunity to earn a living by work freely chosen or accepted, and will take appropriate steps to safeguard this right.
2. Among the measures to be taken by each of the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include technical and professional guidance and training, preparation of programs, policies and techniques to achieve steady economic, social and cultural development and full and productive employment under conditions safeguarding fundamental political and economic freedoms to the individual.
simple reading of the rule and its reception as the art. 75, inc. 25 of the CN contradicts the words "... the supposed right to full employment ... no programmatic plexus arises from the Constitution."
The "relative stability or improper."
For years we have maintained that these expressions are summarized under the dichotomy of "stability" or "instability." The TBI system is not adequate international law of human rights little by little, the doctrine and jurisprudence that asintonía work are accepted in many cases the mechanism was solution under a declaration of invalidity of discriminatory dismissal. In the present case also possible for the invalidity of the act which happens to be the final cause of dismissal, that is, the decision of the consortium created to alter the legal fate of the good public policy.
Synthesis.
It is clear that the safety argument confirms our initial prevention exposed on the two negative responses to the scenario "what if we rented the goal?: Ethics, leaving a person without work and home is violating their dignity and weighed against existential international law of human rights, and practice, the consortium will be exposed to a menu of responses where the worker concerned, the collective actor that represents him or the State could clear the validity of the act and penalties for illegal behavior. 
It glaring, as shown, that the species are expressed diametrically opposed views on human rights involved in the issue at the appropriate call "What if we rented the goal?".
At least it has become clear, opposition for lack of recognition of the axiological primacy of social rights over individual or collective and symbolic reference Protectoria character of labor law, principles, both reached by the discursive assumptions rehearse in our early work.
Nevertheless, other issues need more emphasis.
arbitrary or unfair dismissal is a wrongful act.
This assertion coined by JUSTO LOPEZ classic seems to be sufficient reason for the lawyer committed to the international law of human rights to defend abdicate moral wrongfulness and build a further arguments with this harmful substance. We said at work, and it has not been contradicted, that if the consortium decides to fire a person to rent housing viola dos derechos fundamentales de esa persona, ya que lo deja “sin trabajo y sin vivienda”.
Despedir no está permitido como lo supone el saber vulgar. La cláusula constitucional de “protección contra el despido arbitrario” pena con una ilicitud tarifada rescindir sin invocar causa o hacerlo sin demostrar justa causa. El acto ilícito sería válido, según la mayoría de la doctrina laboralista, salvo que, como bien lo señala el Dr. Resqui Pizarro podría nulificarse:
…si se viera originado en la intención de dejar libre la habitación destinada a vivienda del trabajador para ser luego de modificado su destino primitivo conforme el RCA puesta en rental to others, it was considered discriminatory and unlawful action by the employer-consortium, which would alter the public order established in the system.
In any case, the "ultimate cause" of the act of firing would also be illegal, not only constitute a discriminatory act (which has other nullification device), but for violating labor law and order, as we have seen, defines the fate of the housing can not be altered to the detriment of any worker providing services in buildings that actually or potentially consortium. dismissal if I rent a property protected by the labor law, the cause of the act illegal. The working device that validates the dismissal may be circumvented petitioning the invalidity of the act antecedent.
Therefore, the so-called "property rights" on the home goal is "limited" by a rule of law and order and if the same joint holder of that (the consortium) intends to exercise it in violation of a rule of public policy, incur an abuse of the law (art. 1071, VCCI.), to the extent that the act which manifests such action is illegal and null Surrogate (art. 18, C. cit.), in addition to denature the legally protected by the system establish the institution in question. Nothing
tiene que ver con esta cuestión el desalojo de un trabajador despedido.
La mención de una serie de fallos de la C. Nac. Trab. que se ha formulado intenta poner énfasis en un argumento inocuo. El trabajador despedido debe desocupar la vivienda y si no lo hace, el consorcio está en todo su derecho de desalojarlo e, incluso, querellarlo por usurpación sin que el obrero pueda invocar un infundado “derecho de retención”.
El derecho del consorcio a peticionar el desalojo de la portería no transforma ipso iure a el bien en cuestión en un espacio común cuyo destino pueda alterarse alegremente en trasgresión al orden público laboral. La confusión entre la naturaleza jurídica pay housing provision, obviously linked to an employment contract in force, not stirred "the legal fate of public policy" that haunts the home goal, he regains his fitness as such to be occupied by another worker building real or potential and become another accessory of another contract.
Full employment.
is a human right justiciable. Resta remind the Lords Commissioners of the Horizontal Property Law that art. 6 of the ICESCR states:
1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right to work, which includes the right of everyone to have the opportunity to earn a living by work freely chosen or accepted, and will take appropriate steps to safeguard this right.
2. Among the measures to be taken by each of the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include technical and professional guidance and training, preparation of programs, policies and techniques to achieve steady economic, social and cultural development and full and productive employment under conditions safeguarding fundamental political and economic freedoms to the individual.
simple reading of the rule and its reception as the art. 75, inc. 25 of the CN contradicts the words "... the supposed right to full employment ... no programmatic plexus arises from the Constitution."
The "relative stability or improper."
For years we have maintained that these expressions are summarized under the dichotomy of "stability" or "instability." The TBI system is not adequate international law of human rights little by little, the doctrine and jurisprudence that asintonía work are accepted in many cases the mechanism was solution under a declaration of invalidity of discriminatory dismissal. In the present case also possible for the invalidity of the act which happens to be the final cause of dismissal, that is, the decision of the consortium created to alter the legal fate of the good public policy.
Synthesis.
It is clear that the safety argument confirms our initial prevention exposed on the two negative responses to the scenario "what if we rented the goal?: Ethics, leaving a person without work and home is violating their dignity and weighed against existential international law of human rights, and practice, the consortium will be exposed to a menu of responses where the worker concerned, the collective actor that represents him or the State could clear the validity of the act and penalties for illegal behavior.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Mizuno Volleyball Backpack
Mouse Pad with USB ports
Well call me ... IGNORANT, but na, I did not know that was already in the market (and what is not know, lol) this pijería. It has been bought my nephew and very cool it is. Right now I'm going through the headphones pa watch movies, and I'll get more arsenal, jejejejeje, Someday vibrator with USB port? hahaha.
......... Well yes sir, this is not an art pen, is a vibrator and USB port, but does not save data, it is recharging pa pa the most demanding jejejeje, NO THOSE WITH LAPTOPS! TOO DIRTY .... FOSSSSS, JAJAJAJA. that if, e? Laptop technical services make the August jejejejeje 
Well call me ... IGNORANT, but na, I did not know that was already in the market (and what is not know, lol) this pijería. It has been bought my nephew and very cool it is. Right now I'm going through the headphones pa watch movies, and I'll get more arsenal, jejejejeje, Someday vibrator with USB port? hahaha.
......... Well yes sir, this is not an art pen, is a vibrator and USB port, but does not save data, it is recharging pa pa the most demanding jejejeje, NO THOSE WITH LAPTOPS! TOO DIRTY .... FOSSSSS, JAJAJAJA. that if, e? Laptop technical services make the August jejejejeje
Email Thank You Interview
What if we rented the goal? By Alejandro Anibal Segura.
axiological Introduction and application.
One of the most unwanted signs of "crisis" we would be suffering, it's that sort of sauf qui peut sweeping those sectors with lower social sensitivity. Trite that is remembered by the rock formation of democratic and republican thought, dwells on the sources of the French Revolution: liberty, equality, fraternity.
Breaking the fraternal bonds between citizens is, believe it or not, a delay of those assumptions and their translation into the here and now becomes "miraculously" on questions like the title of this work.
is a fact of reality to assume that the vast majority, if not all, of those living in buildings subject to horizontal property regime in the big cities are people who work (we use this expression instead of the classic "working "), so that they are socially" equal "to those who carry out their work task, precisely in such buildings.
equality "one and the other"-value French revolutionary reitérese, "should be the keystone to understanding the problem, assuming the artificiality of that some are "owners" and other "working" is not important axiological question, to the extent that, as men of law, the lawyers who make up this Institute have sworn to adjust our conduct to the Constitution and the international law of human rights. This plexus policy aimed at the realization of those values \u200b\u200bontic and not full of ups and downs these realities merely existential.
is clear then that a person claiming to be in a "superior" or hold "more" than the manager of your building, and you can stop reading these reflections, the angle of approach problem is so diametrically opposed to the values \u200b\u200band norms in question to prevent any form of understanding and agreement, operating as prejuicial unavoidable obstacle.
maximize the benefits. Ontic equality correcting existential inequality.
As mentioned popularly, the viscera more sensitive when they are reduced revenue is usually the pocket. It is logical that a community of any kind, among which the consortium has, try to reduce expenditures to cushion the impact critical. Thus, within the social degradation which prints the whole crisis, the decline in material standards decanted slowly into a loss axiological. Is the time of every man for himself with the harsh confrontation between the ones and others that vie for your interest without limitation any scruples, "freedom" of others. A new decanting of the values \u200b\u200bof 1789 has operated.
orthodox economic liberalism defines this bid for resources as "profit maximization, where in a sort of social Darwinism some sectors with greater autonomy (freedom, intention and discernment), move to other" disadvantaged ", which must yield the conditions of others.
People working and that this fact had a unique socio chance to join the process economic and social development through the alienation of their labor are therefore in an inferior position existential relationship even those who have some means of production and determine the incorporation of a company's last full or partially employed, givers are working. Is not the place to remember these real social constraints that led to the "social question" (known to all) and its provisional decision by the state, with the issuance of mandatory rules, which displace the autonomy-and put to all persons involved in the work done in a real equal opportunities (equality ontological existential correcting inequality). As we see, labor law, which is the mechanism in question, was born to postulate the equality of people and if you want to restrict the freedom to expand one of the others. Why do we accept the average conscience of mankind? For the sake of brotherhood, of course. Again confirms our proposal on the validity of the assumptions inherent in the modern era started: liberty, equality and fraternity.
Therefore, the state burst in the game of wolves and lambs stop the process of maximizing profits. Hence the visceral hatred that defenders of these positions Orthodox economic, by the basic tenets of labor law. Declaim the "freedom" at the expense of trampling on the "equality" with the similar. Not to mention the "brotherhood"! Assume that collective action by workers is an "obstacle" to the free play of market forces. Disseminated without understanding the axiological foundation that gave rise to them, that labor standards are "tight" to be "flexible", etc.. The Argentineans can attest to the evils of certain policies implemented before 2003 under that ideological bias and its impact on the social fabric: the unemployment rate which reached and surpassed the 20 points are enough lessons to understand what would happen if you leave the guiding principles of our social legislation.
workers against workers "?
fraternal not understand the construction process of deliberative democracy has to look at the other, on the other person who works, an enemy. Someone who, for reasons sauf qui peut this, it can attack so brutal a manner as, for example, leave without work and homeless.
purely axiological Under this premise, is that we restate the initial question, knowing that the answer to the question of the title is translated inexorablmente in the unavoidable loss of human rights for someone else-a fellow-, that is, stopping the fraternal process in the here and now.
may hold with a dose of cynicism that this is a "moral issue" or ethics, outside "the authority of judges" (art. 19, Constitution). This thinking implies that the constitutionally guaranteed property rights, has a superior body to the other rights, introduced first by the "reform" in 1957 and again by 1994. Also postulated that the human, economic, social and cultural rights contain a non-existent judicial enforcement.
However, and fortunately this is not the approach taken by the Supreme Court's Office, who, following the doctrine of the Human Rights Commission has repeatedly held that the rules enshrined in the ICESCR, are operationally and can be sued for any citizen as an act from individuals or the state itself puts them at risk. Who does not understand that these rights are justiciable and have a different etiology most comprehensive social rights than mere "owners" have a second chance to leave the reading of the booklet.
The civil matter.
However, for the moment, we will approach treatment of the legal issue would (or not) answer affirmatively the question "What if we rented the goal?"
We refer to the "privatization" of the common area where you live in charge of building: the "goal." SUSANA
LAMBOIS, condo specialist says, when analyzing the 13,512 law that the common parts are those that are essential or useful for the operation of the system and the exercise of the exclusive right, so that they are not conceived without those. Understands the things that make building security and common use.
is clear, therefore, that if the building was built with a "goal", which was to provide a greater share of "security" and for the benefit of the community consortium.
regulations usually defined as common property to housing goal. But if not done, the 12,981 law gives it such a fate, as we shall see below.
Some of the writers consider that may change the "destination" of the forum. Continuing along this line of reasoning hypothesis would require a unanimous decision of the owners. Another expert on the subject, Dr. MARIANI OF VIDAL, argues that the common parts that are "use and common enjoyment "can be" privatized. " But he warns that:
"... As for the most part reporting of a custodial or privatization of a common part whenever possible, it would seem that, as the identification of common parts and depriving a clause in the Regulation of Condominium, the majority required for these purposes would be necessary for the reform of the Regulations, ie, in accordance with Art. 9 of the Act 'a majority of not less than two-thirds. " Nevertheless, uniform doctrine and jurisprudence, maintain that in such cases since unanimity would be essential that those terms by the formation heritage status of the joint venturers - 'statutory provision' as opposed to merely 'regulations' use and enjoyment or exercise of rights by the investors interested in its amendment, the right of ownership of each of them, insusceptible of change without the consent of each other. "
is clear that the decision to denature the target of the goal which we know is to house the workers building and is not used as a source of income, it exceeds the powers of the administrator who is not entitled to work in that sense but to show that the treasury income enters the consortium with the aim of alleviating a "crisis." We have seen that the housing goal is a common area with a preset destination by law. To alter such a destination, modifying the legal scope of the regulation, as we saw, it was necessary to reform, with requisite majority. Without thinking, as we argue in our view, that destiny is predetermined by a Public Order Act, which would make the decision unanimous, even in a legal act null and void.
But back on the classification of the parties 'private', where property rights appears glaring, and the "common", which is relativized by rules coexistence in a democratic system must be construed in accordance with constitutional principles and international law of human rights at stake.
LAMBOIS SUSANA says, as the Horizontal Property Specialist are ...
Communist Party: This sets out the common parts, which are essential or useful for the operation of the system and the exercise of the exclusive right, so such that they are inconceivable without the former. Understands the things that make building security and common use.
The goal, without any doubt, is a common part of "common use". The
distinction between those unique parts is essential as different will be the legal regime applicable depending on whether one or the other. Thus, reparations for damage caused on common or exclusive parties will be borne by the consortium or the holder of the sole, respectively, the origin of the damage, the maintenance of things in each category will fall on one or the other according to their ownership, the right to arrange or alter in any way each stop will be governed differently, and so on.
The result is that the distinction is well established in order to avoid time conflicts to resolve. As the enumeration made This article (referring to 2, Law 13 512) is declarative, which means that there are other goods, parts and services, which are common without the article you mention it, will depend on the provisions of Joint Ownership Rules and Administration for its detail.
Legally, common things are subject to an undivided condominium forced in terms of art. 2710 Coll. Civil, indispensable for the exercise of ownership rights to exclusive things. This interpretation arises from the provisions of art. 18 of the Act repealing the arts to its effects. 2685 and 2693 in the same order, so it is not applicable as the escape neglect the contribution the cost of maintenance or repair or ban not to require the division. This is explained by the need to establish a permanent system of undivided for the purpose of the configuration of the system. However, no one can say that the undivided forced to set is the same as Civil Code regulates but it additionally applies when a situation is not foreseen in the law.
The decision on "fate" of things called "common" exclusive to the owners. Course, no administrator, or a majority non-regulation, can alter "unilaterally" such condition.
Others argue that the distinction should not be presumed that the common character of the things mentioned in the preceding paragraphs because they generally serve to all owners and are in function and serve them, but nothing would prevent the inclusion of these in Regulation and Administration of Condominium and exclusive parties in accordance with a special destiny. Understand that when the rule indicates what type of law is said to be common property for this reason, only involves a rebuttable presumption may be rebutted by convention when not concerned in each case of things necessary for the intended use or enjoyment of the whole building. If the common quality derives from its involvement the benefit of all co-owners or safety of the building, its different parts will be one way or another according to their nature or purpose and not under the law making the statement.
LAMBOIS says:
since in principle and common things are of that quality by virtue of being essential for the safety of the building or the use of all joint owners could not mutate their status. However, in many cases and by the will of all joint owners, they can be privatized. Of course, that such change can not be operated on things that are essentially common, such as those necessary for the safety of the building, but when not affect the very existence of horizontal property regime, ie in those cases that do not jeopardize the possibility of a full mastery over the sole responsibility of each owner to restringírsele no powers have remained common to contribute to the maintenance of the building through exploitation (as premises are rented and the proceeds are solved with the rental costs for common expenses), side door when it has been changed to another, roofs, etc.. It concludes that the land, foundations, exterior walls, bearing walls and all those things essential to the operation of the system are insusceptible of being privatized.
The goal provided "security" to the building. But suppose not. Question of a common good without the condition, which would be "privatized." But still LAMBOIS:
However, the possibility of changing the quality of these common things that can be privatized is limited to the unanimous will of the investors. Is that when they are common, each participates in a percentage of your property, so turning them into proprietary it is reduced. If his will not be required for the transfer, it would affect their property rights. About ordinary things exists undivided condominium status, so none of the condominium may be made without the consent of all legal acts importing the current year and immediate property right, being enough opposition to prevent what one most wants to do about it without being able to dispose of some alienation in against or ignoring the will of the other (art. 2680, Cod. Civil).
But what we are discussing here is not the transformation of the goal on another drive, for sale, but to gain income from it. Thus, the argument of the percentage change in the fall. Continues the author cited:
the question also arises when you want to privatize is the use without reducing the percentage for each owner (a common hallway, for whatever reason you are concerned for the exclusive use of one of the co-owners). Although in this case no changes in the domain of each co-owner, is also affecting their property rights in the use and enjoyment, so that only the unanimity of the conversion efforts can be made. Generally, to make this change in the use of a common thing, is expressly establishes the extent of such use, with the consequent obligations of the beneficiary and a greater contribution to the common expenses in return for the greater use of the thing.
disaffect If after such use is intended exclusively recognized to the holders of one or more units, will need their agreement or majority suffice? Whenever it is a right attached to property owner can not be withdrawn without the concurrence of his will, so it is necessary for all that means to deprive of a benefit that was acquired conventionally.
clear. The nature of common part prevents the "privatization", the legal concept that extends to the "privatization of its use." The concept LAMBOIS marginal notes is perfectly applicable to the situation at hand.
Indeed, housing is a goal common property that, by operation of law, is a destination that, in a sense is "privatized" since it can only live in the building worker.
GABAS said rightly that:
Converting own common good, not cause an increase in property or benefit to the consortium or other joint owners, or improvement of the market value of the units can not be resolved, but unanimously. It also requires such unanimity when an exclusive right becomes common.
Similarly, with respect to amendments which seek to alter the characteristics and distribution of functional units building-dividing or unifying with others, it will be necessary to obtain the unanimous consent of the co-owners to draft a new plan of subdivision and the provision of appropriate reform in the regulation of ownership.
Then, the joint venturers have already found the answer sought in the civil law: "Yes. We can rent the goal ... but for this we must alter their destiny by making it a common good income producer. "
Too bad for them that there is employment law.
The labor issue. Various tricks and plausible deactivation.
Sitting this, assuming that the consortium as a whole decides to alter the target goal, there can be a second obstacle theme. The public nature of labor law and the express premise established in art. 13 of Law 12,981, the reading and teaching is inevitable to understand the problem at hand. Standard says:
Staff working exclusively for an employer either as a manager, assistant or carer, is entitled to enjoy the use of appropriate hygienic room and receive the necessary working tools for the performance of their tasks . In rental buildings that house ever built for the said personnel shall not alter the fate originating from the same detrimental to the worker.
If it proves impossible to implement the first clause of this Article, the employee is entitled to a salary supplement of $ 60 per month.
The standard covers three different scenarios:
• The right to enjoy a hygienic and adequate room (in addition to the tools that is a matter extraneous to which we are analyzing).
• The mandatory rule that prevents privatize or alter the fate of the goal "to the detriment of the worker."
• The status of inexcusable failure to comply with the obligation, primarily the lack of housing built with that target, which was settled with the ratings "homeless."
The urge to rent the goal has led some consortia to commit the folly of dismissing the employee if, by the simple expedient to mind the popular saying "... the dog died of rabies is over, there were" aggrieved worker "to prevent free action against the spirit of the law.
In our "Labor Legal System in Buildings" (Ed. Lexis-Nexis, Buenos Aires 2006) have argued the vertical application of the law 12,981 to all skilled worker and legal translation in the scheme, which would assume that the term "personnel" is projected onto any person working in the building. Thus, if the consortium decides to "fire the manager" to replace him with someone who "will clean two or three days or hours," does not exempt from legal injunction preventing alter the fate of the house because the "worker" has a potential harm and puts in place against the decision made inevitable by the consortium.
The criterion for a certain part of the doctrine restrictively attributed to "injured employee" to charge displaced permanent housing to meet the affirmative the question that titles this paper not stand the scrutiny. First, the worker fired could articulate the invalidity of his own dismissal if established that was segregated from the working place for the purpose of violating the rule that expressly prohibits changing the destination. Possess two ways I could use so adjuvant: a) To seek the nullity of the act for violating a rule of public employment (Articles 12 and 14, LCT) decision to drag the "ultimate cause" of dismissal (art. 953, VCCI .) b) Show that the maneuver had a discriminatory content and articulate the mechanics of law 23.592.
Thus, the owners to ensure that the employee never reclaim the maneuver that cumulatively deprived of their jobs and their housing, their modus operandi to be extreme. The next choice (2 nd) will lead to the Conciliation Service Required to "make it give up" all that plexus legal guardian, on the express premise of "do pronounce" the "Clause Lafalce" This is the firm promise that "a Once the amount received under this Agreement, nothing else will have to claim your employer for the employment relationship to unite them. " Fortunately, this stratagem has a first rampart, marked by the conspicuous change in the approach that has shown approval to be granted the SECLO since May 25, 2003, especially in the current administration of Dr. Fabian Nesis, very attentive to all kinds of fun to labor rights and public order laws. Also, colleague or union representative to accompany the worker is exposed to so great resignation ethical judgments that will air later in the respective estates.
We have heard, in order to lavish the imagination tends to undermine the rights at stake that could "renounce the use" worker "in house" and then take it "homeless" (3 ª ploy). People who are not adept in handling labor law also assume that the maneuver would be "invisible", if between the resignation and the new contract elapses a time "a month or two." Of course, the return, mediate or not the payment of compensation (art. 255, LCT) does not alter the unity of the contract (art. 18, LCT) or prejudice the right of workers now "homeless" to articulate absolute invalidity of the clause at any pejorative, with no obstacle in the course of this limitation since the action would be limitations.
The fourth "idea" will fire the "in house" and hire a new worker entering the building "homeless" with the consolidated position. If you like, with self-fulfilling prophecy: "We've rented housing goal." With the same flimsy argument with someone intended to hide the sun with the palm of your hand, this time trying to count in favor of labor fraud with the complicity of another, supposedly "a right based on good faith" to stop the wayward worker's claim of buildings that now tries intervertebral its status as "homeless" by the normal "with." The nature of the rule does not show any hindrance and the condition of the third "good faith" does not mean fit the absolute invalidity of the contract which has signed with the consortium, subject to submit to the failure of title to the property locado in mean no one can convey a better title than you have initially. There will be subsequent litigation as between the tenant in good faith and the consortium, but the effects of absolute nullity drag the invalidity of the same character of all acts consistent, especially when they were taken to violate a rule of law and order and protect work.
The fifth and sixth hypotheses emphasize the role of association or a group concerned to ensure the supremacy of the human, economic, social and cultural rights. The
end devices. The triple nature of constitutional law at work. Expired
arguably the systematic work, as often happens in times of degradation axiological, a sector of society assumes the worst position. A "fifth hypothesis" would be "fire and hire a cleaning company." In this case, try moving the recipient's job responsibilities of providing a "third party" who is paid a fee or price, usually much higher than that correspond under direct recruitment of a building worker.
The idea seems attractive, since there would be "no worker buildings "that he can be" harmed "by the lack of provision of housing in the building and leased to a third party.
this analysis omits the role that deliberative democracy must meet the association, while defending the interests of workers. The union has standing to ensure the effective application in its scope, of the collective agreement signed in nature "vertical." This provision and the text of the 12,981 law stating that all employee benefits that occur in buildings subject to horizontal property regime are governed by those rules. Also staff in question is necessarily framed by the collective agreement signed by the union (see Doctrine of the Whole Judgement C. Nac. Trab., in the case "Rizzo v. Star Chemistry.
Finally, in addition to exposing the consortium framing an issue of the unlucky "fifth idea to rent the goal" will result in greater expenditure (support to the cleaning company) and an eventual decision of the Labor Court, before the commission of unfair practice.
hypothesis final proves that puts plainly opposed the rights of the venturers, as owners of a real right-front group building workers, unions have organized a series of rights to enforce constitutional program targeted.
knows that the art. 14 bis of the CN has a triple at the top right of workers individually and collectively considered:
• Right to work.
• Rights of workers (or people working) conditions and decent working environment and satisfactory.
• The right to full employment.
This program is part of a larger, covered in the menu of international law of human rights in general, seeks to incorporate the disadvantaged sectors of society, like workers, economic and social system existing in a given society.
this perspective, the freedom "of not hiring" a few, just the owners, is opposed to social etiology rights inducing the inclusion of large numbers of people in the system. This is a way to "provide the general welfare" to the benefit of all they consist of an active mechanism that diffuses the direct causes of insecurity as unemployment and structural poverty.
The union, as a natural manager of this process may act to seek shelter (on the basis of Art. 43, NC) against the gross violation (default) rights involved, especially the "right to work and right to full employment" and would be able to demonstrate that the lack of provision of a workplace is violation of those basic human rights violated.
prognosis is not an imaginary, ideal or utopian. It is ridiculous that a person or group of people who make abundant use goal arguments to rent and get an ancillary income can understand, as the Court says, "the sign of the times." Legal thinking that puts social rights over individual rights contrasts with the rustic drive every man for himself.
So the question that we have trying to have two answers. An ethic: leave a person without work and home is violating their dignity existential and set against the international law of human rights. Practice: the Consortium will be exposed to a menu of responses where the worker concerned, the collective actor that represents him or the State could clear the validity of the act and penalties for misbehavior.
La Matanza, June 10, 2009. 
axiological Introduction and application.
One of the most unwanted signs of "crisis" we would be suffering, it's that sort of sauf qui peut sweeping those sectors with lower social sensitivity. Trite that is remembered by the rock formation of democratic and republican thought, dwells on the sources of the French Revolution: liberty, equality, fraternity.
Breaking the fraternal bonds between citizens is, believe it or not, a delay of those assumptions and their translation into the here and now becomes "miraculously" on questions like the title of this work.
is a fact of reality to assume that the vast majority, if not all, of those living in buildings subject to horizontal property regime in the big cities are people who work (we use this expression instead of the classic "working "), so that they are socially" equal "to those who carry out their work task, precisely in such buildings.
equality "one and the other"-value French revolutionary reitérese, "should be the keystone to understanding the problem, assuming the artificiality of that some are "owners" and other "working" is not important axiological question, to the extent that, as men of law, the lawyers who make up this Institute have sworn to adjust our conduct to the Constitution and the international law of human rights. This plexus policy aimed at the realization of those values \u200b\u200bontic and not full of ups and downs these realities merely existential.
is clear then that a person claiming to be in a "superior" or hold "more" than the manager of your building, and you can stop reading these reflections, the angle of approach problem is so diametrically opposed to the values \u200b\u200band norms in question to prevent any form of understanding and agreement, operating as prejuicial unavoidable obstacle.
maximize the benefits. Ontic equality correcting existential inequality.
As mentioned popularly, the viscera more sensitive when they are reduced revenue is usually the pocket. It is logical that a community of any kind, among which the consortium has, try to reduce expenditures to cushion the impact critical. Thus, within the social degradation which prints the whole crisis, the decline in material standards decanted slowly into a loss axiological. Is the time of every man for himself with the harsh confrontation between the ones and others that vie for your interest without limitation any scruples, "freedom" of others. A new decanting of the values \u200b\u200bof 1789 has operated.
orthodox economic liberalism defines this bid for resources as "profit maximization, where in a sort of social Darwinism some sectors with greater autonomy (freedom, intention and discernment), move to other" disadvantaged ", which must yield the conditions of others.
People working and that this fact had a unique socio chance to join the process economic and social development through the alienation of their labor are therefore in an inferior position existential relationship even those who have some means of production and determine the incorporation of a company's last full or partially employed, givers are working. Is not the place to remember these real social constraints that led to the "social question" (known to all) and its provisional decision by the state, with the issuance of mandatory rules, which displace the autonomy-and put to all persons involved in the work done in a real equal opportunities (equality ontological existential correcting inequality). As we see, labor law, which is the mechanism in question, was born to postulate the equality of people and if you want to restrict the freedom to expand one of the others. Why do we accept the average conscience of mankind? For the sake of brotherhood, of course. Again confirms our proposal on the validity of the assumptions inherent in the modern era started: liberty, equality and fraternity.
Therefore, the state burst in the game of wolves and lambs stop the process of maximizing profits. Hence the visceral hatred that defenders of these positions Orthodox economic, by the basic tenets of labor law. Declaim the "freedom" at the expense of trampling on the "equality" with the similar. Not to mention the "brotherhood"! Assume that collective action by workers is an "obstacle" to the free play of market forces. Disseminated without understanding the axiological foundation that gave rise to them, that labor standards are "tight" to be "flexible", etc.. The Argentineans can attest to the evils of certain policies implemented before 2003 under that ideological bias and its impact on the social fabric: the unemployment rate which reached and surpassed the 20 points are enough lessons to understand what would happen if you leave the guiding principles of our social legislation.
workers against workers "?
fraternal not understand the construction process of deliberative democracy has to look at the other, on the other person who works, an enemy. Someone who, for reasons sauf qui peut this, it can attack so brutal a manner as, for example, leave without work and homeless.
purely axiological Under this premise, is that we restate the initial question, knowing that the answer to the question of the title is translated inexorablmente in the unavoidable loss of human rights for someone else-a fellow-, that is, stopping the fraternal process in the here and now.
may hold with a dose of cynicism that this is a "moral issue" or ethics, outside "the authority of judges" (art. 19, Constitution). This thinking implies that the constitutionally guaranteed property rights, has a superior body to the other rights, introduced first by the "reform" in 1957 and again by 1994. Also postulated that the human, economic, social and cultural rights contain a non-existent judicial enforcement.
However, and fortunately this is not the approach taken by the Supreme Court's Office, who, following the doctrine of the Human Rights Commission has repeatedly held that the rules enshrined in the ICESCR, are operationally and can be sued for any citizen as an act from individuals or the state itself puts them at risk. Who does not understand that these rights are justiciable and have a different etiology most comprehensive social rights than mere "owners" have a second chance to leave the reading of the booklet.
The civil matter.
However, for the moment, we will approach treatment of the legal issue would (or not) answer affirmatively the question "What if we rented the goal?"
We refer to the "privatization" of the common area where you live in charge of building: the "goal." SUSANA
LAMBOIS, condo specialist says, when analyzing the 13,512 law that the common parts are those that are essential or useful for the operation of the system and the exercise of the exclusive right, so that they are not conceived without those. Understands the things that make building security and common use.
is clear, therefore, that if the building was built with a "goal", which was to provide a greater share of "security" and for the benefit of the community consortium.
regulations usually defined as common property to housing goal. But if not done, the 12,981 law gives it such a fate, as we shall see below.
Some of the writers consider that may change the "destination" of the forum. Continuing along this line of reasoning hypothesis would require a unanimous decision of the owners. Another expert on the subject, Dr. MARIANI OF VIDAL, argues that the common parts that are "use and common enjoyment "can be" privatized. " But he warns that:
"... As for the most part reporting of a custodial or privatization of a common part whenever possible, it would seem that, as the identification of common parts and depriving a clause in the Regulation of Condominium, the majority required for these purposes would be necessary for the reform of the Regulations, ie, in accordance with Art. 9 of the Act 'a majority of not less than two-thirds. " Nevertheless, uniform doctrine and jurisprudence, maintain that in such cases since unanimity would be essential that those terms by the formation heritage status of the joint venturers - 'statutory provision' as opposed to merely 'regulations' use and enjoyment or exercise of rights by the investors interested in its amendment, the right of ownership of each of them, insusceptible of change without the consent of each other. "
is clear that the decision to denature the target of the goal which we know is to house the workers building and is not used as a source of income, it exceeds the powers of the administrator who is not entitled to work in that sense but to show that the treasury income enters the consortium with the aim of alleviating a "crisis." We have seen that the housing goal is a common area with a preset destination by law. To alter such a destination, modifying the legal scope of the regulation, as we saw, it was necessary to reform, with requisite majority. Without thinking, as we argue in our view, that destiny is predetermined by a Public Order Act, which would make the decision unanimous, even in a legal act null and void.
But back on the classification of the parties 'private', where property rights appears glaring, and the "common", which is relativized by rules coexistence in a democratic system must be construed in accordance with constitutional principles and international law of human rights at stake.
LAMBOIS SUSANA says, as the Horizontal Property Specialist are ...
Communist Party: This sets out the common parts, which are essential or useful for the operation of the system and the exercise of the exclusive right, so such that they are inconceivable without the former. Understands the things that make building security and common use.
The goal, without any doubt, is a common part of "common use". The
distinction between those unique parts is essential as different will be the legal regime applicable depending on whether one or the other. Thus, reparations for damage caused on common or exclusive parties will be borne by the consortium or the holder of the sole, respectively, the origin of the damage, the maintenance of things in each category will fall on one or the other according to their ownership, the right to arrange or alter in any way each stop will be governed differently, and so on.
The result is that the distinction is well established in order to avoid time conflicts to resolve. As the enumeration made This article (referring to 2, Law 13 512) is declarative, which means that there are other goods, parts and services, which are common without the article you mention it, will depend on the provisions of Joint Ownership Rules and Administration for its detail.
Legally, common things are subject to an undivided condominium forced in terms of art. 2710 Coll. Civil, indispensable for the exercise of ownership rights to exclusive things. This interpretation arises from the provisions of art. 18 of the Act repealing the arts to its effects. 2685 and 2693 in the same order, so it is not applicable as the escape neglect the contribution the cost of maintenance or repair or ban not to require the division. This is explained by the need to establish a permanent system of undivided for the purpose of the configuration of the system. However, no one can say that the undivided forced to set is the same as Civil Code regulates but it additionally applies when a situation is not foreseen in the law.
The decision on "fate" of things called "common" exclusive to the owners. Course, no administrator, or a majority non-regulation, can alter "unilaterally" such condition.
Others argue that the distinction should not be presumed that the common character of the things mentioned in the preceding paragraphs because they generally serve to all owners and are in function and serve them, but nothing would prevent the inclusion of these in Regulation and Administration of Condominium and exclusive parties in accordance with a special destiny. Understand that when the rule indicates what type of law is said to be common property for this reason, only involves a rebuttable presumption may be rebutted by convention when not concerned in each case of things necessary for the intended use or enjoyment of the whole building. If the common quality derives from its involvement the benefit of all co-owners or safety of the building, its different parts will be one way or another according to their nature or purpose and not under the law making the statement.
LAMBOIS says:
since in principle and common things are of that quality by virtue of being essential for the safety of the building or the use of all joint owners could not mutate their status. However, in many cases and by the will of all joint owners, they can be privatized. Of course, that such change can not be operated on things that are essentially common, such as those necessary for the safety of the building, but when not affect the very existence of horizontal property regime, ie in those cases that do not jeopardize the possibility of a full mastery over the sole responsibility of each owner to restringírsele no powers have remained common to contribute to the maintenance of the building through exploitation (as premises are rented and the proceeds are solved with the rental costs for common expenses), side door when it has been changed to another, roofs, etc.. It concludes that the land, foundations, exterior walls, bearing walls and all those things essential to the operation of the system are insusceptible of being privatized.
The goal provided "security" to the building. But suppose not. Question of a common good without the condition, which would be "privatized." But still LAMBOIS:
However, the possibility of changing the quality of these common things that can be privatized is limited to the unanimous will of the investors. Is that when they are common, each participates in a percentage of your property, so turning them into proprietary it is reduced. If his will not be required for the transfer, it would affect their property rights. About ordinary things exists undivided condominium status, so none of the condominium may be made without the consent of all legal acts importing the current year and immediate property right, being enough opposition to prevent what one most wants to do about it without being able to dispose of some alienation in against or ignoring the will of the other (art. 2680, Cod. Civil).
But what we are discussing here is not the transformation of the goal on another drive, for sale, but to gain income from it. Thus, the argument of the percentage change in the fall. Continues the author cited:
the question also arises when you want to privatize is the use without reducing the percentage for each owner (a common hallway, for whatever reason you are concerned for the exclusive use of one of the co-owners). Although in this case no changes in the domain of each co-owner, is also affecting their property rights in the use and enjoyment, so that only the unanimity of the conversion efforts can be made. Generally, to make this change in the use of a common thing, is expressly establishes the extent of such use, with the consequent obligations of the beneficiary and a greater contribution to the common expenses in return for the greater use of the thing.
disaffect If after such use is intended exclusively recognized to the holders of one or more units, will need their agreement or majority suffice? Whenever it is a right attached to property owner can not be withdrawn without the concurrence of his will, so it is necessary for all that means to deprive of a benefit that was acquired conventionally.
clear. The nature of common part prevents the "privatization", the legal concept that extends to the "privatization of its use." The concept LAMBOIS marginal notes is perfectly applicable to the situation at hand.
Indeed, housing is a goal common property that, by operation of law, is a destination that, in a sense is "privatized" since it can only live in the building worker.
GABAS said rightly that:
Converting own common good, not cause an increase in property or benefit to the consortium or other joint owners, or improvement of the market value of the units can not be resolved, but unanimously. It also requires such unanimity when an exclusive right becomes common.
Similarly, with respect to amendments which seek to alter the characteristics and distribution of functional units building-dividing or unifying with others, it will be necessary to obtain the unanimous consent of the co-owners to draft a new plan of subdivision and the provision of appropriate reform in the regulation of ownership.
Then, the joint venturers have already found the answer sought in the civil law: "Yes. We can rent the goal ... but for this we must alter their destiny by making it a common good income producer. "
Too bad for them that there is employment law.
The labor issue. Various tricks and plausible deactivation.
Sitting this, assuming that the consortium as a whole decides to alter the target goal, there can be a second obstacle theme. The public nature of labor law and the express premise established in art. 13 of Law 12,981, the reading and teaching is inevitable to understand the problem at hand. Standard says:
Staff working exclusively for an employer either as a manager, assistant or carer, is entitled to enjoy the use of appropriate hygienic room and receive the necessary working tools for the performance of their tasks . In rental buildings that house ever built for the said personnel shall not alter the fate originating from the same detrimental to the worker.
If it proves impossible to implement the first clause of this Article, the employee is entitled to a salary supplement of $ 60 per month.
The standard covers three different scenarios:
• The right to enjoy a hygienic and adequate room (in addition to the tools that is a matter extraneous to which we are analyzing).
• The mandatory rule that prevents privatize or alter the fate of the goal "to the detriment of the worker."
• The status of inexcusable failure to comply with the obligation, primarily the lack of housing built with that target, which was settled with the ratings "homeless."
The urge to rent the goal has led some consortia to commit the folly of dismissing the employee if, by the simple expedient to mind the popular saying "... the dog died of rabies is over, there were" aggrieved worker "to prevent free action against the spirit of the law.
In our "Labor Legal System in Buildings" (Ed. Lexis-Nexis, Buenos Aires 2006) have argued the vertical application of the law 12,981 to all skilled worker and legal translation in the scheme, which would assume that the term "personnel" is projected onto any person working in the building. Thus, if the consortium decides to "fire the manager" to replace him with someone who "will clean two or three days or hours," does not exempt from legal injunction preventing alter the fate of the house because the "worker" has a potential harm and puts in place against the decision made inevitable by the consortium.
The criterion for a certain part of the doctrine restrictively attributed to "injured employee" to charge displaced permanent housing to meet the affirmative the question that titles this paper not stand the scrutiny. First, the worker fired could articulate the invalidity of his own dismissal if established that was segregated from the working place for the purpose of violating the rule that expressly prohibits changing the destination. Possess two ways I could use so adjuvant: a) To seek the nullity of the act for violating a rule of public employment (Articles 12 and 14, LCT) decision to drag the "ultimate cause" of dismissal (art. 953, VCCI .) b) Show that the maneuver had a discriminatory content and articulate the mechanics of law 23.592.
Thus, the owners to ensure that the employee never reclaim the maneuver that cumulatively deprived of their jobs and their housing, their modus operandi to be extreme. The next choice (2 nd) will lead to the Conciliation Service Required to "make it give up" all that plexus legal guardian, on the express premise of "do pronounce" the "Clause Lafalce" This is the firm promise that "a Once the amount received under this Agreement, nothing else will have to claim your employer for the employment relationship to unite them. " Fortunately, this stratagem has a first rampart, marked by the conspicuous change in the approach that has shown approval to be granted the SECLO since May 25, 2003, especially in the current administration of Dr. Fabian Nesis, very attentive to all kinds of fun to labor rights and public order laws. Also, colleague or union representative to accompany the worker is exposed to so great resignation ethical judgments that will air later in the respective estates.
We have heard, in order to lavish the imagination tends to undermine the rights at stake that could "renounce the use" worker "in house" and then take it "homeless" (3 ª ploy). People who are not adept in handling labor law also assume that the maneuver would be "invisible", if between the resignation and the new contract elapses a time "a month or two." Of course, the return, mediate or not the payment of compensation (art. 255, LCT) does not alter the unity of the contract (art. 18, LCT) or prejudice the right of workers now "homeless" to articulate absolute invalidity of the clause at any pejorative, with no obstacle in the course of this limitation since the action would be limitations.
The fourth "idea" will fire the "in house" and hire a new worker entering the building "homeless" with the consolidated position. If you like, with self-fulfilling prophecy: "We've rented housing goal." With the same flimsy argument with someone intended to hide the sun with the palm of your hand, this time trying to count in favor of labor fraud with the complicity of another, supposedly "a right based on good faith" to stop the wayward worker's claim of buildings that now tries intervertebral its status as "homeless" by the normal "with." The nature of the rule does not show any hindrance and the condition of the third "good faith" does not mean fit the absolute invalidity of the contract which has signed with the consortium, subject to submit to the failure of title to the property locado in mean no one can convey a better title than you have initially. There will be subsequent litigation as between the tenant in good faith and the consortium, but the effects of absolute nullity drag the invalidity of the same character of all acts consistent, especially when they were taken to violate a rule of law and order and protect work.
The fifth and sixth hypotheses emphasize the role of association or a group concerned to ensure the supremacy of the human, economic, social and cultural rights. The
end devices. The triple nature of constitutional law at work. Expired
arguably the systematic work, as often happens in times of degradation axiological, a sector of society assumes the worst position. A "fifth hypothesis" would be "fire and hire a cleaning company." In this case, try moving the recipient's job responsibilities of providing a "third party" who is paid a fee or price, usually much higher than that correspond under direct recruitment of a building worker.
The idea seems attractive, since there would be "no worker buildings "that he can be" harmed "by the lack of provision of housing in the building and leased to a third party.
this analysis omits the role that deliberative democracy must meet the association, while defending the interests of workers. The union has standing to ensure the effective application in its scope, of the collective agreement signed in nature "vertical." This provision and the text of the 12,981 law stating that all employee benefits that occur in buildings subject to horizontal property regime are governed by those rules. Also staff in question is necessarily framed by the collective agreement signed by the union (see Doctrine of the Whole Judgement C. Nac. Trab., in the case "Rizzo v. Star Chemistry.
Finally, in addition to exposing the consortium framing an issue of the unlucky "fifth idea to rent the goal" will result in greater expenditure (support to the cleaning company) and an eventual decision of the Labor Court, before the commission of unfair practice.
hypothesis final proves that puts plainly opposed the rights of the venturers, as owners of a real right-front group building workers, unions have organized a series of rights to enforce constitutional program targeted.
knows that the art. 14 bis of the CN has a triple at the top right of workers individually and collectively considered:
• Right to work.
• Rights of workers (or people working) conditions and decent working environment and satisfactory.
• The right to full employment.
This program is part of a larger, covered in the menu of international law of human rights in general, seeks to incorporate the disadvantaged sectors of society, like workers, economic and social system existing in a given society.
this perspective, the freedom "of not hiring" a few, just the owners, is opposed to social etiology rights inducing the inclusion of large numbers of people in the system. This is a way to "provide the general welfare" to the benefit of all they consist of an active mechanism that diffuses the direct causes of insecurity as unemployment and structural poverty.
The union, as a natural manager of this process may act to seek shelter (on the basis of Art. 43, NC) against the gross violation (default) rights involved, especially the "right to work and right to full employment" and would be able to demonstrate that the lack of provision of a workplace is violation of those basic human rights violated.
prognosis is not an imaginary, ideal or utopian. It is ridiculous that a person or group of people who make abundant use goal arguments to rent and get an ancillary income can understand, as the Court says, "the sign of the times." Legal thinking that puts social rights over individual rights contrasts with the rustic drive every man for himself.
So the question that we have trying to have two answers. An ethic: leave a person without work and home is violating their dignity existential and set against the international law of human rights. Practice: the Consortium will be exposed to a menu of responses where the worker concerned, the collective actor that represents him or the State could clear the validity of the act and penalties for misbehavior.
La Matanza, June 10, 2009.
Friday, June 5, 2009
Vídeos Pomos De Mexicanas Famosas
'Home' movie that was released simultaneously on YouTube and the cinema.
"The movie HOME, French producer Luc Besson, shooting the wonders of nature from the air, with the help of renowned photographer Yann Arthus-Bertrand, specialist areas and a regular contributor footage from National Geographic. "
"is a film to raise awareness about the problem of environmental degradation of the planet, has today released June 5, coinciding with World Environment Day, simultaneously in the YouTube video channel and in the halls film, where you can see at cost.
To YouTube is a chance to explore a new field, just as the popular website file sharing of copyrighted audiovisual Google seeks to attract publicity and be profitable. In fact, YouTube has just recently launched XL (www.youtube.com / XL), a version of the portal designed to facilitate viewing of films.
Home, the film's producer Luc Besson film and Yann-Arthus Bertrand on the decline of the Earth, is available for English-speaking countries, English, French, Russian, Portuguese and German. The 90-minute film co-produced by EuropaCros duration and Elzevir Films will be available on YouTube for 10 days.
The film can also be seen in more than 180 theaters in 80 countries and giant television screens located in public places like Times Square in New York, the Champs de Mars in Paris or Trafalgar Square in London, television (more than a hundred channels), online in high definition in four languages \u200b\u200b(YouTube and Google), DVD (4.99 euros) and in cinemas. Except
United States, where they will be organized numerous public screenings, theater owners agreed to participate in the operation and propose tickets' cost price. " Mexican actress Salma Hayek voiced the same in the English version of the film. Glenn Close and Jacques Gamblin did English and French respectively. " 
"The movie HOME, French producer Luc Besson, shooting the wonders of nature from the air, with the help of renowned photographer Yann Arthus-Bertrand, specialist areas and a regular contributor footage from National Geographic. "
"is a film to raise awareness about the problem of environmental degradation of the planet, has today released June 5, coinciding with World Environment Day, simultaneously in the YouTube video channel and in the halls film, where you can see at cost.
To YouTube is a chance to explore a new field, just as the popular website file sharing of copyrighted audiovisual Google seeks to attract publicity and be profitable. In fact, YouTube has just recently launched XL (www.youtube.com / XL), a version of the portal designed to facilitate viewing of films.
Home, the film's producer Luc Besson film and Yann-Arthus Bertrand on the decline of the Earth, is available for English-speaking countries, English, French, Russian, Portuguese and German. The 90-minute film co-produced by EuropaCros duration and Elzevir Films will be available on YouTube for 10 days.
The film can also be seen in more than 180 theaters in 80 countries and giant television screens located in public places like Times Square in New York, the Champs de Mars in Paris or Trafalgar Square in London, television (more than a hundred channels), online in high definition in four languages \u200b\u200b(YouTube and Google), DVD (4.99 euros) and in cinemas. Except
United States, where they will be organized numerous public screenings, theater owners agreed to participate in the operation and propose tickets' cost price. " Mexican actress Salma Hayek voiced the same in the English version of the film. Glenn Close and Jacques Gamblin did English and French respectively. "
Monday, May 25, 2009
Cool Youth Group Slogans
WEEKEND FOR 37 EUROS! Income Statement
Yep, this weekend I've been in the south of the island in the Hotel Barceló Varadero and for only 37 euros. Admission on Saturday departure on Sunday morning at 12 ... including lunch (buffet) and dinner (buffet) on Saturday and Sunday breakfast (buffet) can not forget that Saturday to spend all day in the pool with open bar , you serve yourself! and I can ensure that drinks are not exhausted, at the pool you can also prepare hot dogs or burgers yourself. SUNDAY CAN ALSO BE THE DAY POOL. They put a bracelet on his wrist and wing color ... Enjoy!
Here some pictures of the place
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Fastest Point & Shoot
2008 - key facts
May 4, 2009
opens deadline for filing tax returns online or in person.
June 23, 2009
Deadline to confirm the draft tax returns with direct debit entry account and annual return to enter 2008 with a result by direct debit.
June 30, 2009
the deadline for submitting income tax declaration for 2008 and confirmed the draft tax returns with refund, waiver of the return, negative, and enter without direct debit.
Other data;
· Limit for submission: June 30
· Limit Non-state: $ 22,000
· Sections state:
· from 0 to 17707.20 euros (15.66%)
· of 17,707 , 20-33007.20 (18.27%)
· from 33007.20 to 53407.20 (24.14%) from
· to 53407.20 (27.13%)
· Web Tax Agency: www.agenciatributaria.es
° Phone: 901
December 12, 1924 (automatic)
· 901 200 345 (support)
901 22 33 44 (by appointment)
NGOs unite to call for the mark 'their' box
"This year, do not forget to mark it. Casilla social purposes." This year, NGOs have decided that is united force and, first, the four major planks of the solidarity sector have a joint campaign to encourage taxpayers to put the cross social aims in its statement of income que se puede presentar del 2 de mayo al 30 de junio.
En la última declaración, correspondiente a 2007, uno de cada dos contribuyentes rellenó la casilla y se consiguió recaudar un 45% más que el año anterior, más de 244 millones de euros. Al marcar la cruz, la persona destina el 0,7% de sus impuestos a proyectos sociales. Esta opción existe desde hace ya 20 años, aunque el importe subió en 2006 desde el 0,52% anterior.
La Plataforma de ONG de Acción Social, la Plataforma de Voluntariado de España, la Plataforma de Infancia y la Coordinadora OMG para el Desarrollo-España han presentado hoy la campaña, que se compone de cuñas, publicidad en prensa, carteles, octavillas and a television commercial.
NGOs have tried to emphasize the need, now more than ever in times of crisis, that increased funding for social spending in Spain is more than seven points below the average for EU-15. In some organizations demand has soared 40% because of the crisis.
"Because of this demand that will increase the percentage to 1%, and that the Government set a minimum amount of funds, which then resarza with taxes," said Juan Lara, president of the Platform for Social Action NGO. Lara estimated that the minimum should be at "no less than 400 million euros." The request is supported, moreover, by the estimate that, probably in the next year there is a significant drop in the collection, Lara recalled.
Apart from this, the tax return is also a box for the Catholic Church, who makes his own campaign, and can be marked together with the social purposes but the amount is split, ie, which can be used to 1.4% of the taxes if they make both. The NGO representatives also tried to influence that about a quarter of the budget that comes from the box going to religious organizations such as Caritas. The Church, which is also campaigning own for people to fill your box, plans to start tomorrow.
Last year, NGOs reported, 32.6% of taxpayers checked the box only for social purposes, 21.7% did so only with the church and 11.68% both options simultaneously. The money is not intended for that purpose going into the coffers of the state. "
2009 Campaign" Mark social purposes "(Castilian) (spot 30 seconds)
May 4, 2009
opens deadline for filing tax returns online or in person.
June 23, 2009
Deadline to confirm the draft tax returns with direct debit entry account and annual return to enter 2008 with a result by direct debit.
June 30, 2009
the deadline for submitting income tax declaration for 2008 and confirmed the draft tax returns with refund, waiver of the return, negative, and enter without direct debit.
Other data;
· Limit for submission: June 30
· Limit Non-state: $ 22,000
· Sections state:
· from 0 to 17707.20 euros (15.66%)
· of 17,707 , 20-33007.20 (18.27%)
· from 33007.20 to 53407.20 (24.14%) from
· to 53407.20 (27.13%)
· Web Tax Agency: www.agenciatributaria.es
° Phone: 901
December 12, 1924 (automatic)
· 901 200 345 (support)
901 22 33 44 (by appointment)
NGOs unite to call for the mark 'their' box
"This year, do not forget to mark it. Casilla social purposes." This year, NGOs have decided that is united force and, first, the four major planks of the solidarity sector have a joint campaign to encourage taxpayers to put the cross social aims in its statement of income que se puede presentar del 2 de mayo al 30 de junio.
En la última declaración, correspondiente a 2007, uno de cada dos contribuyentes rellenó la casilla y se consiguió recaudar un 45% más que el año anterior, más de 244 millones de euros. Al marcar la cruz, la persona destina el 0,7% de sus impuestos a proyectos sociales. Esta opción existe desde hace ya 20 años, aunque el importe subió en 2006 desde el 0,52% anterior.
La Plataforma de ONG de Acción Social, la Plataforma de Voluntariado de España, la Plataforma de Infancia y la Coordinadora OMG para el Desarrollo-España han presentado hoy la campaña, que se compone de cuñas, publicidad en prensa, carteles, octavillas and a television commercial.
NGOs have tried to emphasize the need, now more than ever in times of crisis, that increased funding for social spending in Spain is more than seven points below the average for EU-15. In some organizations demand has soared 40% because of the crisis.
"Because of this demand that will increase the percentage to 1%, and that the Government set a minimum amount of funds, which then resarza with taxes," said Juan Lara, president of the Platform for Social Action NGO. Lara estimated that the minimum should be at "no less than 400 million euros." The request is supported, moreover, by the estimate that, probably in the next year there is a significant drop in the collection, Lara recalled.
Apart from this, the tax return is also a box for the Catholic Church, who makes his own campaign, and can be marked together with the social purposes but the amount is split, ie, which can be used to 1.4% of the taxes if they make both. The NGO representatives also tried to influence that about a quarter of the budget that comes from the box going to religious organizations such as Caritas. The Church, which is also campaigning own for people to fill your box, plans to start tomorrow.
Last year, NGOs reported, 32.6% of taxpayers checked the box only for social purposes, 21.7% did so only with the church and 11.68% both options simultaneously. The money is not intended for that purpose going into the coffers of the state. "
2009 Campaign" Mark social purposes "(Castilian) (spot 30 seconds)
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Use Os Silvernitrate In Cervix
We dejastes .... Just love songs
... Antonio, with beauties like this.
"Where we took the imagination
where with eyes closed is
infinitely divisible fields where the first light created by the seed
blue sky
back to that place where I was born
of sun, tang and song
desire laughter, I erase the fear
wind that seems to speak her murmur
moves the world and you see him dancing gracefully
and with it the setting for my home
platter
Ocean, Sea
infernal temper is a natural ...
little or no cost, to be one more
of sun Tang and desire,
are his hands in my hair,
of snow, hurricanes and
depths of my recreational site.
Silence, freshness and sanity,
give encouragement to my madness
snow, hurricane, there desire, there where I break
"
... Antonio, with beauties like this.
"Where we took the imagination
where with eyes closed is
infinitely divisible fields where the first light created by the seed
blue sky
back to that place where I was born
of sun, tang and song
desire laughter, I erase the fear
wind that seems to speak her murmur
moves the world and you see him dancing gracefully
and with it the setting for my home
platter
Ocean, Sea
infernal temper is a natural ...
little or no cost, to be one more
of sun Tang and desire,
are his hands in my hair,
of snow, hurricanes and
depths of my recreational site.
Silence, freshness and sanity,
give encouragement to my madness
snow, hurricane, there desire, there where I break
"
Monday, May 11, 2009
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Marriage Registration Aurangabad
restriction Solution Megavideo - 72 minutes
Ventanita FUCKED!
MAC Address Changer is a small application that basically just two megs masks your address on the network and replaced by another. Run the program and just click on "Change MAC ID", will drop the connection for about thirty seconds and automatically connects you. YOU CAN BE SEEING THE MOVIE!
Download program
Ventanita FUCKED!
MAC Address Changer is a small application that basically just two megs masks your address on the network and replaced by another. Run the program and just click on "Change MAC ID", will drop the connection for about thirty seconds and automatically connects you. YOU CAN BE SEEING THE MOVIE!
Download program
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Monday, May 4, 2009
Aluminum Foil Boat Penny Lab Write Up
Photos taken with the Yesterday was moving
the day of the cross, 03 May. And here the contest was held crosses.
's capital Santa Cruz de Tenerife it is named Fernández de Lugo, who planted the cross back in 1494, when he landed for the conquest of the last island. This cross is kept in the church of La Concepción.
"The area on which now stands the city and the municipality of Santa Cruz de Tenerife has been the subject of human occupation since time Guanches, about 2,000 years ago, as attested by the archaeological sites found. As the famous St. Andrew's Mummy . In addition to caves with some mummified animal remains and stone engravings Guanches. The area where now lies Santa Cruz de Tenerife belonged to Menceyato Guanche Anaga, which was the easternmost of the island.
Santa Cruz de Tenerife Añaza occupies the territory called by the Guanches, the pre-Hispanic inhabitants of the islands. "
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Where Can Buy Truffettes De France
Because cross
Laps gives life to me has been what I wanted most
Without realizing it,
was no farewell goodbye I hold you
I can not
Laps gives life I never thought this would happen to me
is so hard to remember our moments
back time I would like
air Touching and feeling you get
And I would not get away
Living always by your side And tell
there is no place pa 'walk
Because without you nothing is the same
If you're more to me
Among my arms I'm waiting
My dream is to see you return back to breathe
If one day you can return to having you
I live only for love da Vueltas
life did not tell me you to be gone someday
tenertre Failure to me is an irony of you so sure
I felt
Laps gives life you walked through that door
mine life and told me to come back in a few hours
And still I wait in silence
No tomorrow
That I can wake up and not see your face
No That
no words I pull up the pain of my soul
there is no place pa 'walk
Because without you nothing is the same
If you're more to me
Among my arms I'm waiting
My dream is to see you back Return to breathe
If one day you can return to having you
I live only for love
Laps gives life to me has been what I wanted most
Without realizing it,
was no farewell goodbye I
I can not hold you
Laps gives life to me has been what I wanted most
Without realizing it,
was no farewell goodbye I hold you
I can not
Laps gives life I never thought this would happen to me
is so hard to remember our moments
back time I would like
air Touching and feeling you get
And I would not get away
Living always by your side And tell
there is no place pa 'walk
Because without you nothing is the same
If you're more to me
Among my arms I'm waiting
My dream is to see you return back to breathe
If one day you can return to having you
I live only for love da Vueltas
life did not tell me you to be gone someday
tenertre Failure to me is an irony of you so sure
I felt
Laps gives life you walked through that door
mine life and told me to come back in a few hours
And still I wait in silence
No tomorrow
That I can wake up and not see your face
No That
no words I pull up the pain of my soul
there is no place pa 'walk
Because without you nothing is the same
If you're more to me
Among my arms I'm waiting
My dream is to see you back Return to breathe
If one day you can return to having you
I live only for love
Laps gives life to me has been what I wanted most
Without realizing it,
was no farewell goodbye I
I can not hold you
Friday, May 1, 2009
On The Phone Indicator
The pandimia phases for a disease (of all people)
* Phase 1 refers to viruses that circulate among animals but still have not caused any human infection
* Phase 2: the virus, which affects domestic and wild animals, has infected a person, so it can be considered a potential pandemic threat
* Phase 3: The virus affects small groups of people and is given for the first time, the transmission from human to human, and not only from animals to humans. However, they are sporadic cases and under certain circumstances.
* Phase 4: The power of the virus to spread between people is checked and is capable of causing 'community outbreaks. " This significantly increases the risk of a pandemic. Any country or verify any suspected case should immediately contact with the WHO to assess the situation and coordinate the response. This phase shows a significant jump in the risk of a pandemic but does not mean that it inevitably occurs
* Step 5: It is characterized by the spread of virus from human to human by at least two countries in the same region. "Although many places are not affected, the statement of this phase is a clear sign that the pandemic is imminent and that the time to implement all necessary measures are just "according to the Organization.
* Phase 6: Pandemic phase. The outbreak of the disease has been recorded in most countries in different regions. Reaching this level means that the pandemic is underway, has begun. It can not be prevented, but just try to control.
Newspaper article
The Country of the day 01/05 / 09
"The experts advising the European Union is very clear. "Once you declare the pre-pandemic alert phase 5, passing through 6 is inevitable." Thus sharply yesterday Angus Nicoll, chief of the influenza program of the European Centre for Disease Control (ECDC), the body which, from Stockholm, is responsible for advising the Commission of Health of the EU.
40% of Europeans are infected
Of course, Nicoll stressed that the current virus is not "so far, as bad as the one that caused the 1918 flu, but will have a considerable impact," he said. And when he speaks of "substantial" does not beat around the bush. "Between 40% and 50% of Europe's population" will be the new flu, he said. In a normal winter the incidence is around 15%, but varies a lot every year because the virus changes. "Keep in mind that seasonal influenza [the that occurs each winter] causes about 40,000 deaths each year in the EU, "said Nicoll, so that a new virus may have a significant impact. Of course, most will have a flu" mild ", with the usual exceptions when about these infections: "The elderly and the chronically ill, who will be in more danger. Therefore, the EU insists that every year, pandemic or not, the population is vaccinated.
Because the only It seems that good news does not change is that, despite the gradual escalation in the number of people infected and affected countries, the vast majority of forecasts is still good. is the exception of the Dead in Mexico (seven according to the World Health Organization), something for which no group of experts has an explanation, although some theories: that they began to try later, they were closer to the initial focus or had other previous pathologies that made them more vulnerable. Nicoll
insisted that "it is a flu virus and, therefore, it is easy to catch." The numbers prove it. In the USA and are 109 confirmed cases, including 23-month child who died on Wednesday. In Mexico, the WHO confirmed 97 of those who died seven. Spain is the next country to impact: 13 patients analysis which have tested positive for H1N1 and 101 new people under observation. Peru and Costa Rica have reported the first cases in Latin America outside of Mexico, which shows that it begins to open the road to the south. In total, the WHO-always more conservative in their accounts, yesterday gave 236 cases as safe. Wednesday was 148.
drip Despite ill health organization dependent on the UN ruled yesterday to raise the alert to level 6. "There is no sign that tells us we have to increase the level of alert," said Keiji Fukuda, acting director of WHO. However, the organization has only seven cases of confirmed deaths from the disease. "The reason for this large increase is that in Mexico are doing now thousands of laboratory tests on suspected cases, "said Fukuda. This country has already reported, according to WHO, 97 confirmed cases.
Fukuda tried to reassure on reserves antivirals. He explained that WHO has a stockpile of antiviral five million, acquired between 2005 and 2006 for emergency situations. Now, distribute two million of these treatments to developing countries, including Mexico. "countries are those most in need, "said the acting director of WHO. Fukuda explained that the laboratory responsible for the production of antivirals (such as Roche, prepared by the Tamilfu) increase the production of these drugs, "if necessary."
WHO warned that the southern hemisphere is now exposed to the H1N1 virus by the arrival of the winter season, "which can facilitate their spread." "It's something we watch very closely," he said.
Fukuda encouraged the governments of all countries to be alert to the evolution of the pandemic. "The x-ray of the situation indicates that the virus is behaving like a human flu virus, but with an ability to infect people more than that observed with H5N1," he said.
The acting director of WHO supported the president's request Mexico, which yesterday asked its citizens to stay at home. "The WHO advises those who have to travel and feel sick to stay home until symptoms subside. If you are traveling and you start to feel bad, it's best to go to a medical facility," said Fukuda, who recalled that the WHO does not support the measure to block travel to affected countries.
As WHO and CDC agree on is that now, with the virus present in a dozen countries, it makes no sense to ban flights to Mexico, as requested by France [Argentina and Cuba have done, Ecuador and Peru have decreed state of emergency, which also INCLUDES]. Meeting of Health Ministers Council European ruled yesterday that possibility. " 
pa
* Phase 1 refers to viruses that circulate among animals but still have not caused any human infection
* Phase 2: the virus, which affects domestic and wild animals, has infected a person, so it can be considered a potential pandemic threat
* Phase 3: The virus affects small groups of people and is given for the first time, the transmission from human to human, and not only from animals to humans. However, they are sporadic cases and under certain circumstances.
* Phase 4: The power of the virus to spread between people is checked and is capable of causing 'community outbreaks. " This significantly increases the risk of a pandemic. Any country or verify any suspected case should immediately contact with the WHO to assess the situation and coordinate the response. This phase shows a significant jump in the risk of a pandemic but does not mean that it inevitably occurs
* Step 5: It is characterized by the spread of virus from human to human by at least two countries in the same region. "Although many places are not affected, the statement of this phase is a clear sign that the pandemic is imminent and that the time to implement all necessary measures are just "according to the Organization.
* Phase 6: Pandemic phase. The outbreak of the disease has been recorded in most countries in different regions. Reaching this level means that the pandemic is underway, has begun. It can not be prevented, but just try to control.
Newspaper article
The Country of the day 01/05 / 09
"The experts advising the European Union is very clear. "Once you declare the pre-pandemic alert phase 5, passing through 6 is inevitable." Thus sharply yesterday Angus Nicoll, chief of the influenza program of the European Centre for Disease Control (ECDC), the body which, from Stockholm, is responsible for advising the Commission of Health of the EU.
40% of Europeans are infected
Of course, Nicoll stressed that the current virus is not "so far, as bad as the one that caused the 1918 flu, but will have a considerable impact," he said. And when he speaks of "substantial" does not beat around the bush. "Between 40% and 50% of Europe's population" will be the new flu, he said. In a normal winter the incidence is around 15%, but varies a lot every year because the virus changes. "Keep in mind that seasonal influenza [the that occurs each winter] causes about 40,000 deaths each year in the EU, "said Nicoll, so that a new virus may have a significant impact. Of course, most will have a flu" mild ", with the usual exceptions when about these infections: "The elderly and the chronically ill, who will be in more danger. Therefore, the EU insists that every year, pandemic or not, the population is vaccinated.
Because the only It seems that good news does not change is that, despite the gradual escalation in the number of people infected and affected countries, the vast majority of forecasts is still good. is the exception of the Dead in Mexico (seven according to the World Health Organization), something for which no group of experts has an explanation, although some theories: that they began to try later, they were closer to the initial focus or had other previous pathologies that made them more vulnerable. Nicoll
insisted that "it is a flu virus and, therefore, it is easy to catch." The numbers prove it. In the USA and are 109 confirmed cases, including 23-month child who died on Wednesday. In Mexico, the WHO confirmed 97 of those who died seven. Spain is the next country to impact: 13 patients analysis which have tested positive for H1N1 and 101 new people under observation. Peru and Costa Rica have reported the first cases in Latin America outside of Mexico, which shows that it begins to open the road to the south. In total, the WHO-always more conservative in their accounts, yesterday gave 236 cases as safe. Wednesday was 148.
drip Despite ill health organization dependent on the UN ruled yesterday to raise the alert to level 6. "There is no sign that tells us we have to increase the level of alert," said Keiji Fukuda, acting director of WHO. However, the organization has only seven cases of confirmed deaths from the disease. "The reason for this large increase is that in Mexico are doing now thousands of laboratory tests on suspected cases, "said Fukuda. This country has already reported, according to WHO, 97 confirmed cases.
Fukuda tried to reassure on reserves antivirals. He explained that WHO has a stockpile of antiviral five million, acquired between 2005 and 2006 for emergency situations. Now, distribute two million of these treatments to developing countries, including Mexico. "countries are those most in need, "said the acting director of WHO. Fukuda explained that the laboratory responsible for the production of antivirals (such as Roche, prepared by the Tamilfu) increase the production of these drugs, "if necessary."
WHO warned that the southern hemisphere is now exposed to the H1N1 virus by the arrival of the winter season, "which can facilitate their spread." "It's something we watch very closely," he said.
Fukuda encouraged the governments of all countries to be alert to the evolution of the pandemic. "The x-ray of the situation indicates that the virus is behaving like a human flu virus, but with an ability to infect people more than that observed with H5N1," he said.
The acting director of WHO supported the president's request Mexico, which yesterday asked its citizens to stay at home. "The WHO advises those who have to travel and feel sick to stay home until symptoms subside. If you are traveling and you start to feel bad, it's best to go to a medical facility," said Fukuda, who recalled that the WHO does not support the measure to block travel to affected countries.
As WHO and CDC agree on is that now, with the virus present in a dozen countries, it makes no sense to ban flights to Mexico, as requested by France [Argentina and Cuba have done, Ecuador and Peru have decreed state of emergency, which also INCLUDES]. Meeting of Health Ministers Council European ruled yesterday that possibility. "
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)